However, I think he has employed this same item which he allows to be capital, to appear as part of the one account. You will see from another despatch, when comparing the last, See 2672/82, this paper has clearly explained the true principle; more need not be said.
Abolition of freight licenses - No, Mr. Barclay stated, para. 4, that he did not clearly understand what was meant by abolishing "links" - the license fees for native craft, while retaining the licensing system under the Harbour Ordinance. I cannot clearly make out what is meant, whether to make all licensing nominal or simply to abolish the fees which are levied.
It appears from the present despatch that the latter is what is intended. I do not quite know why the Chinese shipping should be more favourably treated than the vessels of other nationalities; but the subject wants further consideration both financially and politically.
No reply to M. Ford's increase to salary - It was wrongly stated that this increase had been made without the fact being notified to the Secretary of State. Sir J. Hennessy points out that he did report it in his despatch of 2nd August 1886, No. 14402. If M. Tonnochy, when commenting on the item in 19431/81, had referred to this despatch, the mistake would not have been made. Apologise and authorise the continuance.
f
Vraws:
however
I think he he has employed
A
this same item which he allows to
be
br capital,
Annacl
to
affear
as
fout of the
one
Leocruce
You with another
The despatch
when comparing
last
See 2672/82.
this paper has clearly
explained the true principle
more need be said
Abolition of frent
licenses
L no
dad Rimbarley stated pan-4. that be
did not clearly understand what was
meant by abolishing
finks
I native
the license
craft
fees
While retai.
-hing of the licensing systern wader the
Harbour ordinanc
how
I cannot charly
Proposed
Mathe out what is but, whether to
malle all licensing
nominal
a
simply peculiar to
"to abolish the fees which are
229
Ha Junts: the latter appears from the prescut
despatch to be what is intended à I do the Chinese shipping
not
quite
Know
why
Should be more binarily weighted than
the vessels of
Stack
any
N
3
lake the
heavily
otterr nationalitice; but at
Sabject
wants frutter consi-
-duation both financially & politically
So reply
Increase to M. Ford's
M. Ford's salary
It was wrongly
stated that this in create
had been made without the fact being
notified to the Sec.
of
State:
Sie. J. Hennessy points out that he did report it in his despatch of
2nd August
1886
14402.
If M. Tonnochy when commenting o in 19431/81
the item
referred
to this despatch, the mistake wonin
not have been made
Apologise 2
authorise the continuance,
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.